A guide to green fee value for money

Category: 3 star (Page 5 of 15)

122. Eyemouth. 23rd June 2021.

Not one, but two notable challenges making it worth the drive, but mainly for the ‘fish n’ chips’ and a warm welcome.

Round £37.50. Par 72. Course Rating / Slope Rating (yellow) 70.2 /122. Value (out of 5) – 3.5

I’m glad I don’t overly research courses before I play and I learnt long ago to ignore the marketing hype golf clubs use on their websites. It’s similar to reading the tantalising comments on the latest ‘best selling’ book, before you consign it to the charity shop after 50 pages!

The 6th, one of the ‘challenge’ holes at Eyemouth – a watery grave got all 3 of our balls.

Therefore, please ignore “The club was formed in 1894” – the original 9 hole course is completely gone and has been replaced by a ‘home made’ design in 1997 on a different piece of arable (not links) land, known as Gunsgreen Hill, to the south-east of the original course. The course feels like a new ‘parkland’ layout, before saplings mature to properly frame the course.

It is worth playing Eyemouth though; it’s good value, has a couple of notable challenges (more of below) and excellent fresh locally caught ‘fish ‘n chips’, served in the clubhouse restaurant that has long reaching views of the Berwickshire coastline.

The short par three 3rd hole, with the clubhouse on the right that has commanding views. All three of us playing made par, which was unusual for us!

It’s certainly a meaty, if not fishy, course, which has hosted a number of regional and Scottish amateur competitions. Many of the longer holes playing uphill are very difficult, none more so that the 450 yard par four 15th hole, the stroke index 1; albeit, at 450 yards, it is still 200 yards shorter than one of the two ‘challenge’ holes – the par five 13th, cheesely named ” The Hawkness Monster”, at 656 yards it is reputedly Scotland’s longest hole; thankfully it is all downhill. On the day I actually parred the longest hole in Scotland, yet scored a quadruple bogie 9 on the Par 4 15th, That’s golf in a nutshell.

The ‘Hawkness Monster’ – Scotland’s longest hole. 656 yards.

The other notable, and more attractive, hole, is the 6th; curiously named ‘A Still No Ken’ [‘I still don’t know’] it is a visually stunning mid-iron hole over craggy coastline, at 167 yards from the white tee, albeit the actual carry required is only about 140 yards. It’s all in the mind. Played into a stiff North Sea breeze, this would obviously compound the difficulty. All 3 of us playing (Brian and Frank being my partners), found the sea. On reflection I would call the hole something like ‘North Sea Graveyard’.

Frank putting out on the tough par four 15th hole, his technique scrutinised by Brian.

We paid through www.golfnow.co.uk and received about 20% off the ‘rack rate’ prices. Golfnow, has been a great development for peripatetic golfers who prefer to not join a club, but as yet less than 50% of Scottish clubs allow this means of booking, and disappointingly, hardly any of the premier clubs. This is a shame and the pricing of the top100 clubs remains elusively high, compared with the annual fees paid by their members; the ‘must play’ courses leveraging their attractiveness, which I guess is understandable.

The very difficult 11th green overlooking this relatively new course at Eyemouth.

The course was in decent, but not great, condition when we played, despite it being high season; the tees and very large greens were no more than average. Some of the greens were very tricky, most notably the 11th, where you couldn’t afford to be over the back of the green. The fairways are wide, but miss them and the rough is deep – there is no semi-rough to speak of. Although in dry seaside conditions, this might feel like a links, it is arable land, and I consider it a parkland course.

If you plan to play Eyemouth, I recommend considering a buggy if you’re not as fit as you once were. More importantly, the ‘fish ‘n chips’ in the clubhouse were as good as I’ve tasted anywhere. Those, and the very friendly staff at the club, make it a decent place to visit and play.

The openness and wide fairways at Eyemouth, typified here at the 9th.

Finally, in writing about Eyemouth, I came across an extraordinary sporting story in the excellent https://www.golfsmissinglinks.co.uk/ web site, which charts the long lost history of Scottish Links. In the 1880s, during which time golf was played on a 5 hole course around the Eyemouth beach fort, the world famous cricketer, WG Grace actually played two seasons for Eyemouth cricket team. Now there’s a context for a film.

Course Type: Parkland

Par 72 (4 par 5s, 10 par 4s, 4 par 3s)

Distance: 6182

Moly’s Gross score102

Eyemouth – 102 reflects the challenge of this tough layout

120. Castle Park. 21 Jun 2021.

This course’s struggle epitomises Scotland’s golfing challenge

Round £30. Par 70. Course Rating / Slope Rating (yellow) 68.9/121. Value (out of 5) – 2.5

One of the sadder days of my golfing life, was reading about the closure of Camperdown golf course in my home town of Dundee in 2020, a course that I’d once written about as “probably the best value golf in the world“. Thankfully, it has recently been announced that a 9 hole course will be re-opened along with a driving range.

The 5th at Castle Park, one of the better holes on the front nine on this course. Mind the Crows!

One of the legacies of being the ‘Home of Golf’, is that on a per head basis Scotland has the most golf courses of any country. Moreover, when analysed on the GDP per head basis, it’s clear Scotland doesn’t have an economy big enough to sustain so many courses. The long term decline in courses seems set to continue.

The opening hole at Castle Park in Gifford. Typical of the open fairways.

However, this is not a ubiquitous story. Whilst attending a conference of Scottish Golf in 2018, one of the things that became apparent to me, was the divide existing between “have” and “have not” clubs, exposed during a debate about increasing the Scottish Golf ‘members sub’ paid as part of each individual golf club fee. There were several speakers from wealthier clubs (those likely occupying the top 100 Scottish courses) who resented any increase in the levy, as they were “doing very well, thanks very much”.

The 10th at Castle Park. Don’t go to the 18th after this, like I did!

The evidence as I see it, is that the top courses make significant visitor fee income, with many courses costing well over £120 per round, whilst their annual membership fees remain significantly under £1000 per year. For example, for 2022 Carnoustie will charge £270 per visitor round during Summer, but local members only paying the equivalent of not much more than 2 visitor green fees for their annual membership. Living close to a top course is like winning a mini golfing lottery.

Considering the courses outside the (say) top 200 courses, of which Castle Park, in Gifford, is a good example. Opened in 1994, during a period of golfing optimism, by 2015 Castle Park was up for sale and highly anticipated that it would revert to farmland; it was not commercially viable. It was saved from closure by a local Gifford businessman, Craig McLachlan, with a partnership consortium resolved to keep the ‘community resource’ open. This threat to courses and passion to keep them open, is understandable, but the big picture economics will remain a challenge.

Take enough club to carry the valley at the par three 12th at Castle Park.

So has it been worth it, in Castle Park’s case – from a golfing perspective? The short answer for me sadly is no. I would anticipate the continued struggle. Why?

Castle Park sits in a lovely part of the East Lothian countryside, adjacent to the Lammermuir Hills and the affluent village of Gifford, which also has a wonderful Harry Colt designed 9 hole course (Gifford golf course). Many of the Gifford GC Members are also members at any number of the world class courses along the nearby East Lothian ‘Golf Coast’. Gifford is only 20 mins from Gullane Golf Club. So to say the golfing competition is fierce, is an understatement.

Perhaps as a ‘PR defense mechanism’, the course’s website declares itself “The Gleneagles of the South — Peter Allis”. Let’s examine the evidence:

> The scorecard was a haphazard affair on a printed piece of normal paper.

> On arriving at the club and showing our www.golfnow.com booking, we were told “They shouldn’t have allowed your booking” – as if it was our fault! Why do some people go into service?

> Two of the management team were driving around on a buggy – when we walked very close by them we were completely ignored, almost as if we ‘didn’t exist’.

> The tee markings were wooden pegs – no nomenclature.

> There was no guidance to find the next tee boxes, even although it was not always clear. We were well down the “11th” before we realised we were actually playing the 18th, that being the only tee box visible from the 10th green.

> There were dead crows hanging from trees everywhere, apparently to stop the crows eating worms (according to a green keeper).

I honestly find it hard to believe that Peter Allis would have made his Gleneagles comparison. I wonder whether he ever played at Castle Park?

The course itself is a tale of two halves. The front nine is an easy walking affair, but the back nine is very undulating and a really tough walk. It is fairly open parkland, but very long penal rough when you do miss the generous fairways. The greens were well watered and very true, but some had several patch repairs. The bunkers were shallow with insufficient sand.

Moly putting out on the 18th at Castle Park – Decent Value but nothing like “Gleneagles”!

Overall, it was a fairly tough challenge but with some decent holes; the slope index of 121 from the yellows, might have been from a 110 front 9, and a 130 back nine. The memorable holes were mainly on the back, with the par three 12th, played over a valley and the long par three 16th being the highlights for me.

The tale of two halves also represented my score, with 17 stableford points going out, and only 9 points coming back.

The best part is the price which is a very affordable £30, the price alone telling the story of the quality. It’s 2.5 star value, but lets not kid ourselves, this is no more “The Gleneagles of the South”, than Peter Allis, God rest his soul, is part of the woke generation. It’s also too tough a walk to be used as a Society day out – in my humble opinion. That’s why it sadly will struggle – no amount of ‘questionable’ PR will address that.

Course Type: Parkland

Par BB (2 par 5s, 12 par 4s, 4 par 3s)

Distance: 5851

Moly’s Gross score102

118. Callander. 4 Nov 2020.

A course down on its luck, well worth playing, but this is no “Gleneagles” as its web site infers.

Round £24. Par 63. Course Rating / Slope Rating (yellow) 62.6/105. Value (out of 5) – 4

There is a well known equation for individual business success – “under promise and over deliver”. Why do some golf clubs get this completely inverted by “over promising and under delivering”. Callander Golf Club is a perfect example of this error.

Callander golf club has seen much better days – its website is also living in the past.

The club has clearly seen better days – the photo above gives a glimpse of the state of its infrastructure. The ‘temporary’ clubhouse was a shipping container. Its web site includes the following statements, some quoted from media outlets:

Callander Golf Club is probably the most scenic golf course in the UK“,

The charming and challenging 15th is one of the most famous par 3s in Scotland“,

“‘The Scotsman’ includes Callander … ahead of Carnoustie’s Championship Course.

“‘Golf Monthly’ rated Callander among the top ten courses in Scotland for visitors, alongside Gleneagles, Turnberry and St. Andrews.

These statements, collectively, are so wide of the mark – in my humble opinion of course! Just image a touring golfer, having played Gleneagles, Turnberry, St Andrews and Carnoustie, turning up at Callander expecting something similar.

Callander’s 7th, one of the many short par 4s, this one called ‘Blind’ for obvious reasons off the tee.

Please, don’t get me wrong, this is a really fun and lovely golf course set within the beautiful Trossachs area of central Scotland, with very picturesque surroundings, some great and memorable holes and in decent condition.

The 6th at Callander, ‘Dell’, the most difficult of all the holes , in full Autumn colours

The course was opened in 1892 as 9 holes designed by Old Tom Morris, then Willie Fernie extended it to 18 holes in 1914. Heady architects both.

This is, in particular, brilliant holiday golf. It’s short, at well under 5000 yards from the yellow tees. It has fairly generous fairways, not too many bunkers and relatively straightforward greens. There is an abundance of par 3s, with five on the back 9 alone, including the cute 15th, where play is through, or more likely, above a tiny channel between tall trees. It’s memorable, and one of those holes that demands straight hitting.

The Slope Rating of 105, gives most golfers the chance of posting a great score for 18 holes – that’s always nice.

The 16th at Callander, with Ben Ledi in the background

Its well worth playing – but don’t expect to be playing Gleneagles – the green fee will tell the true story, and to that extent it’s also a great course for serious golfers to play as well, in order to experience the great value golf Scotland has to offer. Scots are known for being honest, so lets set the record straight on the web site.

The wonderful par three 15th – ‘Avenue’. But not as famous as, for example, the ‘postage stamp’

On a very wet Autumnal day, with colours in late bloom, Fran and I had the course pretty much to ourselves. I played decent to shoot 80

Course Type: Parkland

Par 64 (0 par 5s (although 1 on the white), 10 par 4s, 8 par 3s)

Distance: 4470

Moly’s Gross score80

Moly’s scorecard at Callander – 80

116. Kirkcudbright. 28 Oct 2020.

Kuh coo bree’ – worth a visit to this course and the local art galleries

Round £32. Par 69. Course Rating / Slope Rating (yellow) 68/117. Value (out of 5) – 3.5

The town of Kirkcudbright, mysteriously pronounced ‘Kuh-coo-bree’, sits on the east of the River Dee estuary in Dumfries and Galloway. It’s a remarkable place; festooned with art galleries and nice coffee shops – one could imagine it being twinned with Glastonbury, the epi-centre of Druids in Somerset, England.

The course, set above the town, gives excellent views of The Galloway Hills providing a very picturesque backdrop – here Moly tees at the 3rd, one of the more straight forward holes – a short par 4.

The town was home of The ‘Kircudbright’ artist movement in the late 1800s, and several of the galleries tell that story. The golf course was in fact founded in 1893, at the very height of the art movement in the town. I wondered how many of the artists, some of international significance, ever played the golf course – after all, the first hole, (Charles) ‘Oppenheimer’ is named after one of the towns best know artists?

A birdie opportunity at the fairly short downhill par five 8th, stroke index 15, hole at Kirkcudbright.

The course was originally 9 holes and only extended to 18 holes in the 1970s, unfortunately neither original or extension architect are listed in the website. After a fairly benign opening par 4 , the second is played uphill across the current 15th hole. After a short par four 3rd, the first of the several difficult holes is the 4th – although a relatively short dog leg right, judging the distance off the tee is crucial to avoid a lost ball. On the day, I saw an old man in the woods searching for golf balls – it was as if I saw the “ghost of golf future” for me.

The signature ninth hole, a challenging par 3 likely requiring a mid to long iron for most players.

The extension of the course, includes a nice run of holes, from 9 through 12, by far the most nuanced part of the course. The 12th, in particular would fit into a much higher standard layout.

The course was in pretty good condition when I played with Fran, but there were a few winter greens in early use, even although they seemed completely playable, and firm.

The beautiful par five 12th hole, the best on the course, in Moly’s opinion. The stroke index of 2 fully justified.

I shot 91, and played pretty well on the back 9, where I had 18 stableford points. This was helped by the wide fairway in the main.

Another wonderful quirk is that the clubhouse is used by an award winning Thai restaurant – I loved this and it just seemed so befitting this ‘cool’ place. The artists would undoubtedly been customers of the restaurant, even if they were not golfers!

Lastly, I have to mention the few local members in the clubhouse were really friendly and helpful explaining the layout of the course.

Course Type: Parkland

Par bb (2 par 5s, 11 par 4s, 5 par 3s)

Distance: 5412

Moly’s Gross score91

A struggle to 91 at Kirkcudbright golf course

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Scotland Golf Bible

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑